What is Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)?

The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a piece of law enacted in the United States that establishes a framework of rules and security standards to preserve federal information and procedures. This risk management framework was enacted as part of the Electronic Government Act of 2002, and it has since been revised and changed.

Since 2002, the scope of FISMA has been expanded to include state agencies that administer federal programs and private enterprises and service providers that have a contract with the United States government. Non-compliance may result in reduced federal funds or other consequences.

The Electronic Government Act was enacted to better the administration of electronic government services and procedures and control federal spending on data security. FISMA was one of the most important laws enacted as part of the Electronic Government Act because it established a mechanism for reducing government data security threats while prioritizing cost-effectiveness. 

FISMA, in particular, mandates federal agencies and others to design, record, and implement agency-wide information security strategies. These programs should be capable of safeguarding confidential material. The legislation also delegated some tasks to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Agency officials should conduct annual assessments of an agency's information security program, such as chief information officers and inspector generals, and such reviews should be reported to OMB. The data will subsequently be used by OMB to help in its oversight obligations, as well as to send yearly reports to congress.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) generates information about standards and recommendations, such as special protection criteria.

What Does FISMA Necessarily Require?

FISMA compliance involves several key components that are designed to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal information and information systems. These components include:

  • Risk Management: Agencies must identify and assess the risks to their information and information systems, and implement measures to mitigate those risks.
  • Security Controls: Agencies must implement a set of baseline security controls to protect their information and information systems from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, interruption, alteration, or destruction.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Agencies must continuously monitor their information to detect and respond to security incidents and vulnerabilities.
  • Security Assessment and Authorization: Agencies must conduct regular security assessments and obtain authorization for their information systems to operate.
  • Training and Awareness: Agencies must provide training and awareness programs to their employees and contractors to ensure they understand their security responsibilities and the risks associated with federal information.
  • Incident Response: Agencies must have procedures in place to respond to security incidents and minimize the impact of those incidents on their information and information systems.

importance of conducting Anti-Money Laundering Risk Assessments and its help identifyingand mitigate financial crimes

FISMA Applies to Whom?

FISMA is a set of regulations that applies to various entities responsible for gathering, securing, and handling federal data. This covers not only federal agencies but also any contractors, subcontractors, or third-party service providers who assist in managing the agency's information and information systems.

Furthermore, FISMA extends to state and local government agencies that receive federal funding or are involved in federal programs. Additionally, private sector organizations that deal with federal data or provide services to federal agencies may be subjected to FISMA's rules and regulations.

FISMA Compliance

FISMA delegated authority to several entities to maintain data security in the federal government. The legislation mandates that program leaders, as well as the head of each agency, undertake yearly assessments of information security programs with the goal of maintaining risks at or below defined acceptable levels in a cost-effective, timely, and efficient way. The NIST lists several stages toward FISMA compliance:

  • Risk classification: Information systems should be classified according to the goals that offer an adequate level of security. Categorization should be done in the order of risk degree to ensure sensitive information is secure.
  • Determine the bare minimum of baseline controls:  Federal systems must meet minimum security standards. Not all security controls must be satisfied, just those that are most relevant to the individual organization and the technologies it employs.
  • Include the policies in the system security policy:  An overview of all the systems and information used, as well as the interfaces between systems and networks, should be preserved. Documentation on the minimum controls used to safeguard these systems should also be maintained. Following that, security measures should be installed in suitable information systems.
  • Use a risk assessment method to fine-tune controls: This should be conducted to confirm security controls and decide whether further controls are required. Once the security controls have been established, evaluate their efficacy.

In order to get licensure, program officials and agency leaders must undertake annual security evaluations. This serves as a kind of security certification. A system's accreditation will be demonstrated by certification.Also, accredited systems are expected to monitor their systems on a continuous basis. This should allow companies to respond rapidly to security problems or data breaches. If there are any modifications, the documentation should be revised. Status reporting, system integration, security measures, and any modifications made to a system should all be part of continuous monitoring.

What are the Risks of Non-compliance with FISMA?

Not complying with FISMA can have severe repercussions for both organizations and the public at large. One of the most immediate risks is the possibility of losing government contracts or funding. Federal agencies are obliged to ensure that their contractors and service providers comply with FISMA regulations, and failure to do so can result in the termination of contracts or loss of funding. 

Non-compliance with FISMA can also pose reputational risks, especially in the current digital age where data breaches and cyber attacks are becoming increasingly common. Consumers are now more conscious of cybersecurity risks and are demanding greater transparency and accountability from the entities they engage with. A cybersecurity incident that results from non-compliance with FISMA can seriously damage an organization's reputation, leading to a loss of customer trust and business opportunities.

Furthermore, this non-compliance can also have legal and regulatory consequences, including fines and penalties for failing to safeguard sensitive information. This can be especially expensive for organizations that handle large amounts of personal or sensitive data, such as healthcare providers or financial institutions.

AML compliance is vital not only in preventing money laundering and terrorist financing but also in combating fraud

You Might Also Like